Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE DBA SKYLINE RIDGE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE DBA SKYLINE RIDGE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER in 515 FAIRVIEW AVENUE, CANON CITY, CO 81212 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 330981051.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Five Star Quality Care DBA Skyline Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Five Star Quality Care DBA Skyline Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
515 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
City
CANON CITY
State
CO
ZIP
81212
Mailing
515 FAIRVIEW AVENUE, CANON CITY, CO 81212
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
113
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Oct 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): When an injury or illness involved one or more days away from work, the employer failed to correctly record the following workplace injury and/or illness correctly on the OSHA Log:     Located at Five Star Care Inc. dba Skyline Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation: on or about August 16, 2011, the employer did not accurately record the following workplace injury and/or illness on the OSHA 300 Log for Calendar year 2009:    a) For an employee who experienced a right foot and ankle sprain on or about April 12, 2009 where the number of days away from work (Column H) was recorded as 89 days and the days of restriction (Column L) was recorded as 91.  The employer stopped the clock on counting days when the total of the two columns together reached the cap of 180 days.    b) For an employee who experienced a right wrist injury on or about April 17, 2009 where the number of days away from work (Column H) was recorded as 8 days and the days of restriction (Column L) was recorded as 172.  The employer stopped the clock on counting the days when the total the two columns together reached the cap of 180 days.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1904.29 B02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Oct 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer must complete an OSHA 301 Incident Report form or an equivalent form, for each recordable injury or illness entered on the OSHA 300 Log:    Located at the Five Star Quality Care Inc dba Skyline Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center; on or about August 15, 2011, an incident report (OSHA 301 or equivalent) for each injury or illness was not accurately completed as required by the regulation.    Calendar Year 2011:  All 5 of the entries recorded on the 300 Log, did not contain the information required in Block #12 on the employer's OSHA 301 or equivalent form for each of the 5 entries. Blocks #6 and #7 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form were left blank for Entry #1, Entry #2 and Entry #4 of the OSHA 300 Log.  Block #6 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #5 of the OSHA 300 Log.  Block #7 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #3 of the OSHA 300 Log.    Calendar year 2010:  All 10 of the entries recorded on the 300 Log, did not contain the information required in Block #12 on the employer's OSHA 301 or equivalent form for each of the 10 entries.  Block #6 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #1, #2, #4, #5, #6 and Entry #7 of the OSHA 300 Log.  Blocks #4 and #6 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #3 of the OSHA 300 Log.  Blocks #6 and #7 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form were left blank for Entry #8 and #9 of the OSHA 300 Log.     Calendar Year 2009:  All 5 of the entries recorded on the 300 Log, did not contain the information required in Block #12 on the employer's OSHA 301 or equivalent form for each of the 5 entries.  Blocks #6 and #7 on the Employer's 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #1 of the OSHA 300 Log.  Block #6 on the OSHA 301 or equivalent form was left blank for Entry #3 on the OSHA 300 Log.    DEFINITIONS: An OSHA 301 or equivalent form includes blocks of information required to be recorded.  Block #6 is, "name of physician or other health care professional."  Block #7 is, "If treatment was given away from the worksite, where was it given?" Asking for facility name, street address (street, city, state and zip code).  Block #4 is, "Date hired." and Block #12 is, "Time employee began work am/pm."
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $900

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Oct 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each Recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and/or an incident report (OSHA 301 form or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness occurred:    a) On or about August 15, 2011 and at times prior, an injury occurring on February 14, 2011 was not recorded on the OSHA 300 for the Year 2011 within 7 calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury had occurred.  The injury resulted in both days away from work and days of restricted activity.  Both Column K (number of days away from work) and Column L (number of days of restricted activity) were blank. Column K should have been recorded as 3 days and Column L should have been recorded as 60 days.    b) On or about August 15, 2011 and at times prior, an injury occurring on June 24, 2011 was not recorded on the OSHA 300 for the Year 2011 within 7 calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury had occurred.  The injury resulted in both days away from work and days of restricted activity.  Both Column K (number of days away from work) and Column L (number of days of restricted activity) were blank. Column K should have been recorded as 23 days and Column L should have been recorded as 46 days.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330981051.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.