Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FALLS STAMPING & WELDING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FALLS STAMPING & WELDING COMPANY in 1720 FALL STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44113 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 330981267.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Falls Stamping & Welding Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Falls Stamping & Welding Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1720 FALL STREET
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44113
Mailing
1720 FALL STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44113
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,850 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):      A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA or equivalently a dose of 50%:    On or about September 15, 2011, at least one employee operating a metal stamping press was exposed to noise above the Action Level of 83.4 dBA, which is a 50% dose at the 80 dBA threshold level time weighted over their 10 hour work shift.  The level found was 69.7% during the 558 minute sampling period.  Employees were not included in a hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2310
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2):     The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    On or about August 24, 2011, portable fire extinguishers were available for employees to use, but initial and annual training were not provided.    Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:    1.	Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.    2.	Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).    3.	Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $2,772 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about August 24, 2011, the employer failed to provide powered industrial vehicle training and certification for employees who drive forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $4620

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about August 24, 2011, hazard communication program training was not implemented at the facility.  Employees utilize chemicals which contain hazardous components including but not limited to oxygen, propane, acetylene, welding gasses, and lubricants including but not limited to Syndraw 6 T-470LB DR.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1):     In every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial, or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked in a conspicuous place in each space to which they related:    On or about August 24, 2011, the employees did not know the intended load limit for the mezzanine level which was being used for storage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 13 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i):     The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:     On or about August 24, 2011, the hazard communication program did not contain a list of hazardous chemicals used at the facility.  Employees utilize chemicals which contain hazardous components including but not limited to oxygen, propane, acetylene, welding gasses, and lubricants including but not limited to Syndraw 6 T-470LB DR.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:           On or about August 24, 2011, several bottles of oil used at the presses were not labeled as to their contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2012
Abate by
Mar 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    On or about August 24, 2011, several bottles of oil used at the presses were not labeled as to their appropriate hazard warnings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Falls Stamping & Welding Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330981267.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.