Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR GRINDING CORP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUPERIOR GRINDING CORP in 524 S SUPERIOR ST, ANTIGO, WI 54409 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 330982141.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Superior Grinding Corp for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Superior Grinding Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
524 S SUPERIOR ST
City
ANTIGO
State
WI
ZIP
54409
Mailing
524 S SUPERIOR ST, ANTIGO, WI 54409
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2):     Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:    Oil from grinding and cutting spray collected on the floor areas around equipment and was not maintained in a dry condition creating a potential slipping hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Abate by
Nov 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment:     The company had not conducted a hazard assessment for the workplace to identify the hazards and assign personal protective equipment that should have been used by employees when exposed to a specific hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.305 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv):     Flexible cords and/ or cables were used for purposes prohibited by paragraphs (A) through (F) of 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv):     The flexible cord powering the Cincinnati Centerless grinder was run through the ceiling directly into the panelboard. No junction box was present.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2040

1903.2 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1903.2(a)(1):     The employer did not post and keep posted OSHA notices informing employees of the protections and obligations provided for in the Act:     The company had not posted an OSHA poster or equivalent to ensure employees were informed of their rights under the OSH Act and the protections afforded them under the Act.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.219 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):     Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     Two pulleys inside the back of the Blanchar grinding machine were not guarded as a belt ran over them, creating an in-running nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.219 E03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i):     Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     The belt inside the back of the Blanchar grinding machine was not guarded as it ran over the pulleys, creating an in-running nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330982141.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.