STRONGSVILLE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ELITE MASONRY & RESTORATION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ELITE MASONRY & RESTORATION LLC in 17599 WHITNEY ROAD BLDG 4, STRONGSVILLE, OH 44136 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 330983636.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELITE MASONRY & RESTORATION LLC
- Site address
- 17599 WHITNEY ROAD BLDG 4
- City
- STRONGSVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44136
- Mailing
- 32330 CENTER RIDGE ROAD, NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 D03 IV
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(iv): Counterweights were not secured by mechanical means to the outrigger beams to prevent accidental displacement: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure counterweights were secured to prevent accidental displacement.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were provided proper access to working levels. The employees were observed climbing into the scaffold from the roof by climbing on the guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.452 P06
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(p)(6): Passage may be made from one platform to another only when the platforms are at the same height, are abutting, and walk-through stirrups specifically designed for this purpose are used: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, , the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were provided proper access to working levels. The employees were using the scaffold to gain access to apartment balconies to perform work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 II
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were protected from fall hazards by a proper fall arrest system and guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.451 G03 I
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Verical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffoldk, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were provided proper fall protection. The personal fall arrest rope was wrapped around a stand pipe on the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees accessing the scaffold from the roof were protected from fall hazards approximately 60 feet by a fall protection system/device. b. On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees accessing and working from the apartment balconies from the scaffold were protected from fall hazards approximately 50 feet by a fall protection system/device.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about 8/31/11 during construction activities including but not limited to tuck pointing and weatherproofing from a two point swing stage scaffold approximately 55 feet high, the employer did not ensure employees using a ladder to access the roof from the apartment balconies was properly extended above the surface or secured at the top with a grasping device provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330983636.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.