Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: LEE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of LEE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING in 9515 GRAND DIVISION AVE, CLEVELAND, OH 44125 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 330986951.

Watch LEE Environmental Cleaning — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LEE Environmental Cleaning is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9515 GRAND DIVISION AVE
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44125
Mailing
11212 AVON AVE SUITE 102, CLEVELAND, OH 44105
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 E04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(4):      All persons entering a regulated area were not supplied with a respirator selected in accordance with paragraph (h)(2) of this section:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  Work was done in a cordoned-off area and no respiratory protection was used.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 G10 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(10)(i):      The employer did not ensure that employees cleaning up debris and waste in a regulated area where respirators are required shall wear respirators which are selected, used and fitted pursuant to provisions of 29 CFR 1926.1101(h):    On or about September 12, 2011, employees did cleanup of asbestos containing material (ACM) at a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  No respirators were worn during this work.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 H01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(ii):      The employer did not ensure that respirators were worn during Class II work where asbestos containing material (ACM) was not removed in a substantially intact state:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  The siding had been cracked when furring strips had been attached to the exterior walls with nails through the transite in a prior renovation job.  The siding broke when it was pulled free from the wall and when it was broken by employees to fit into buckets.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 H01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(vi):      Respirators were not provided and used  by employees performing Class IV asbestos work within regulated areas where employees who are performing other work were required to wear respirators:     On or about September 12, 2011, employees did cleanup of asbestos containing material (ACM) in a regulated area that had been established for asbestos removal at a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  No respirators were worn during this work
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(2)(i):      The employer failed to implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) [except (d)(1)(iii)], and (f) through (m)]:    Refer to 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  No written program was developed and implemented for these employees who were required to use respiratory protection during removal and cleanup work.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i):      Where exposure monitoring was required under this section, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  The siding was cracked and broken and was broken more as it was removed and brought to the ground; no air sampling was done during this removal work or during the cleanup work which followed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 G08 III A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(i):      The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices in all operations covered by this section, regardless of the levels of exposure, in the form of vacuum cleaners equipped with HEPA filters to collect all debris and dust containing ACM and PACM:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees cleaned up debris from a transite siding removal project at a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  Shovels, rakes and other manual methods were used. 29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(A):      When removing cementitious asbestos containing siding or shingles or transite panels the employer did not assure that cutting, abrading or breaking of panels was prohibited unless the employer can demonstrate that methods less likely to result in asbestos fiber release cannot be used:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  The siding broke when it was pulled free from the wall by the use of pry-bars; some panels were broken during removal so as to fit pieces into buckets.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 G08 III C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(C):      When removing cementitious asbestos containing siding or shingles or transite panels the employer did not assure that unwrapped or un-bagged panels or shingles were lowered to the ground via covered dust tight chute, crane or hoist, or placed in impervious waste bag or wrapped in plastic sheeting and lowered to the ground:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  Larger sections of the transite were dropped to the ground, smaller pieces were placed in uncovered buckets.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G08 III D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(D):      When removing cementitious asbestos containing siding or shingles or transite panels the employer did not assure that nails were cut with flat, sharp instruments:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees removed transite siding from a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  Nails were not cut and the panels broke as they were pried from the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1):      The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced:    On or about September 12, 2011, employees did removal of transite panels which contained asbestos and cleanup of ACM from the project at a residence located at 9515 Grand Division Avenue, Cleveland Ohio.  No protective clothing was provided for these employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

KENWORTH

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330986951.