DOVER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC in LOT 14 SAWYER GREEN, DOVER, NH 03820 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 330988346.
Watch Techwood Framing, LLC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Techwood Framing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC
- Site address
- LOT 14 SAWYER GREEN
- City
- DOVER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03820
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1253, LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Jobsite: The employees, exposed to hazards such as: flying objects and fires were not trained in recognizing the hazards, the applicable regulations or the methods to control or eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employee, engaged in wood framing activities and exposed to falls, was not trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the methods of minimizing or abating these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $400.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section: Jobsite: The employees, engaged in wood framing activities and exposed to falls, were not retrained to address inadequate understanding and/or skill in the recognition of fall hazards and the methods of minimizing or abating these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $400
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: The employees, engaged in wood framing activities, were not trained to recognize stairway and ladder hazards or in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(b): The employer did not provide retraining as necessary for each employee using ladders and stairways so that the employee maintained the understanding and knowledge acquired through prior training: Jobsite: The employees, engaged in wood framing activities, were not retrained in order to address the lack of understanding and/or skills necessary to recognize access, stairway and ladder hazards or in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Jobsite: The employees, engaged in framing with pneumatic nail guns, were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. Jobsite: 1) Employees, engaged in framing activities on the second floor deck of the structure, were not protected from falling to lower levels at interior and exterior sides and edges. 2) The exterior basement entrance well openings, used by employees to store material, were not equipped with guardrails and/or covers 3) Second floor window openings, where employees were engaged in framing, were not equipped with guardrails. 4) Employees, using planks as walkways to cross open deck sections, were not protected from falls. 5) Employees walking/working in the vicinity of the floor opening to the basement were not protected from falls to lower levels by fixed covers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks. Lot 14: The rough terrain powered industrial truck was left unattended with an elevated load.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employee operating the rough terrain Powered Industrial Truck (PIT) was trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Jobsite: a) Lot 14: Employees, using the front entrance of the dwelling, were not provided with a means of accessing a break in elevation of 34-inches from ground level to the first floor. b) Lot 14: Employees, using the rear entrance of the dwelling, were not provided with a means of accessing a break in elevation of 30-inches from ground level to the first floor. c) Lot 14: Employees, using the garage entrance of the dwelling, were not provided with a means of accessing a break in elevation of 24-inches from ground level to the first floor. d) Lot 14: Employees, using a 6 foot stepladder to access the second floor deck, were not provided with a means of accessing the break in elevation of 2.4 feet between the top of the ladder and the second floor. e) Lot 20: Employees, using the front entrance of the dwelling, were not provided with a means of accessing a break in elevation of approximately 34-inches from ground level to the first floor. f) Lot 20: Employees, using the rear entrance of the dwelling, were not provided with a means of accessing a break in elevation of 64-inches from ground level to the first floor.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $3600
- — Z (S) $3600
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: Jobsite Lot 20: The interior stairway, used by employees to access the second floor, was not equipped with handrails or a stairrail system on the open side.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.1052 C12
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926: Lot 20: The landing at the top of the stairway, used by the employees to access the second floor, was not protected with a guardrail system.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support: Lot 14: The six foot step ladder, used by the employees to access the second floor, was neither of sufficient length to extend three feet beyond the surface accessed nor was it secured at the top.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $600
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Lot 14: Employees used an unopened stepladder, leaning against the wall, to access the second floor.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: Lot 14: The employees were using the top and top step of the six foot step ladder to access the second floor
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.150 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof: Jobsite: The residence, being framed by the employees, was not equipped with a fire extinguisher.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $600
- — Z (O) $600
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Establishment: The employer did not maintain proper written verification of fall protection training including the date of training and the signature of the trainer and/or employer.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC
DOVER, NH—2013-03-28 00:00:00
TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC
View TECHWOOD FRAMING, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in NH
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-10
C.C. TOMATOES
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
JM BUILDERS LLC
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
D&D INSULATION, LLC
NORTHFIELD, NH—2026-07-03
JP PEST SERVICES
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-01
REYES CARPENTRY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330988346.