JACKSON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MID-STATE EQUIPMENT GROUP, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MID-STATE EQUIPMENT GROUP, INC. in 3660 SCENIC ROAD, JACKSON, WI 53037 (NAICS 423820). OSHA activity number 331068247.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MID-STATE EQUIPMENT GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 3660 SCENIC ROAD
- City
- JACKSON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53037
- Mailing
- 3660 SCENIC ROAD, JACKSON, WI 53037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423820
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employee(s) are exposed to crushing hazards while working under unsupported and unsecured equipment: (a) An employee performing maintenance working under a John Deere rotary harvesting unit, Model #688, attached to a John Deere forage harvester, Model #6750, was exposed to crushing hazards in that the locking pin, used to keep the cutter head from lowering in the event of a hydraulic failure, was not maintained to ensure the pin could properly secure the cutter head. (b) An employee performing maintenance working under a John Deere rotary harvesting unit, Model #688, attached to a John Deere forage harvester, Model #6750, was exposed to crushing hazards in that the rotary harvesting unit was not braced or supported to prevent the unit from falling. This exposed the employee to crushing hazards. Among others, a feasible means of abatement includes, but is not limited to: Follow the manufacturer recommendations which address proper inspection and maintenance of the locking pin and other safety devices associated with equipment and installation of bracing or blocking materials to be used while employees are exposed to unexpected movement of equipment to ensure employees working under equipment are protected from crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.Note: Exception: The employer need not document the required procedure for a particular machine or equipment, when all of the followingelements exist: (1) The machine or equipment has no potential for stored or residual energy or reaccumulation of stored energy after shut down whichcould endanger employees; (2) the machine or equipment has a single energy source which can be readily identified and isolated; (3) the isolation and locking out of that energy source will completely deenergize and deactivate the machine or equipment; (4) the machine or equipment is isolated fromthat energy source and locked out during servicing or maintenance; (5) a single lockout device will achieve a locker-out condition; (6) the lockoutdevice is under the exclusive control of the authorized employee performing the servicing or maintenance; (7) the servicing or maintenance does notcreate hazards for other employees; and (8) the employer, in utilizing this exception, has had no accidents involving the unexpected activation orreenergization of the machine or equipment during servicing or maintenance. (a) Procedures were not established for the control of potentially hazardous energy for employees who work on or around machinery that requires energy control.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4350
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. (a) Training related to energy control was not communicated to employees. The employees regulary work on machinery that requires energy control.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4350
- — Z (S) $6300
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423820)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331068247.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.