KEENE, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: THE MACMILLIN COMPANY INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THE MACMILLIN COMPANY INC in KEENE MIDDLE SCHOOL MAPLE AVE, KEENE, NH 03431 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 331068643.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE MACMILLIN COMPANY INC
- Site address
- KEENE MIDDLE SCHOOL MAPLE AVE
- City
- KEENE
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03431
- Mailing
- 17 ELM STREET, KEENE, NH 03431
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 A01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $4,410
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Scaffold(s) and scaffold(s) component(s) were not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least four times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it: (a) Auditorium The scaffolding platform failed to support the weight of the employee.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $4410
- · C (S) $4410
- · Z (S) $4410
1926.451 B09
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(9): Wood platforms were covered with an opaque finish so as to obscure the top or bottom surface: (a) Auditorium Scaffolding planks were covered with paint.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $680
- · C (S) $4410
- · Z (S) $4410
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: (a) Auditorium The scaffolding legs did not bear on the base plates exposing employees to potential shifting or collapse of the scaffolding.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $500
- · C (S) $3150
- · Z (S) $3150
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $4,410
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. (a) Auditorium The tubular welded scaffolding was erected without the adequate supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $4410
- · C (S) $4410
- · Z (S) $4410
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $50,400 · Current $30,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: (a) Auditorium The tubular welded scaffolding was not inspected by a competent person before each work shift and during the erection process.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $30000
- · C (W) $50400
- · Z (W) $50400
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $50,400 · Current $30,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: (a) Auditorium On or about 09/22/11, The employer did not have a competent person conduct a feasibility assessment for fall protection during the scaffolding erection. (b) Auditorium On or about 09/22/11, Employees were exposed to fall hazard of up to 27 feet 7 inches, while erecting scaffolding without fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $30000
- · C (W) $50400
- · Z (W) $50400
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $50,400 · Current $30,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. (a) Auditorium -The employer did not have a competent person train the employees engaged in erecting scaffolding in the Auditorium in the following: the nature of scaffold hazards; the correct procedures for inspecting and erecting the tubular welded scaffold (including its components); the scaffold's design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity and intended use; and the installation and use of fall protection during the scaffold erection.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $30000
- · C (W) $50400
- · Z (W) $50400
More inspections at The Macmillin Company INC
View The Macmillin Company INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331068643.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.