Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: EXTERIOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of EXTERIOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION in TREEWORTH BLVD. & E ROYALTON RD., BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, OH 44147 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 331069385.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Exterior Land Development Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Exterior Land Development Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
TREEWORTH BLVD. & E ROYALTON RD.
City
BROADVIEW HEIGHTS
State
OH
ZIP
44147
Mailing
P.O. BOX 348, SHARON CENTER, OH 44274
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):     The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:      A. On or about 9/08/11 during the building of a retention wall, the employer did not ensure employees were trained to recognize and abate cave in hazards associated with working next to an excavated wall that was 22 feet in height.      B:  On or about 9/22/11 during excavation activities, the employer did not ensure employees were trained to recognize and abate cave in hazards, and unsafe egress hazards associated with an excavation that measured between 5.5 and 7 feet deep, 59.1 feet in length, and 12.1 feet in width.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.652 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 24, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1):     Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c):     A.  On or about 9/08/11 during the building of a retention wall, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from an excavated wall that was 22 feet in height.      B:   On or about 9/22/11 during excavation activities, the employer did not ensure an employee was protected from a cave in while working in an excavation that measured between 5.5 and 7 feet deep, 59.1 feet in length, and 12.1 feet in width.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.651 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 24, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2):     A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:    On or about 9/22/11 during excavation activities, the employer did not ensure a safe means of egress was used when exiting an excavation the measured between 5.5 and 7 feet deep, 59.1 feet in length, and 12.1 feet in width. The slope at which the employee exited the excavation was 60.781 degrees.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about 09/28/11 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure a forklift operator had been trained, evaluated, or had a current certification.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331069385.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.