CORTLAND, IL —
OSHA Inspection: KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY in 520 E NORTH AVE, CORTLAND, IL 60112 (NAICS 332111). OSHA activity number 331069401.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY
- Site address
- 520 E NORTH AVE
- City
- CORTLAND
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60112
- Mailing
- 1801 PLEASANT STREET, DEKALB, IL 60115
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332111
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.218 A02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $4200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(2)(i): Periodic and regular maintenance safety checks of forging machines had not been established: The employer did not establish periodic and regular maintenance safety checks of forging machines. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.218 A02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $4200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not train personnel for the proper inspection and maintenance of forging machinery and equipment: The employer did not train employees, including but not limited to maintenance employees and operators, in the proper inspection and maintenance of forging machinery and equipment. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.218 A03 IV
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(3)(iv): Blocks or wedges were not made of material the strength and construction of which met or exceeded the specifications and dimensions shown in Table O-11. On or about September 22, 2011, employees used 2" x 4" wood boards to prop up rams and dies of 4,000 pound gravity drop forge hammers during servicing and maintenance procedures. The boards did not meet the minimum allowable strength and dimension requirements for use in forging machines. No abatement documentation or certification is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.218 A03 VIII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $3000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(3)(viii): Scale guards of substantial construction, arranged to stop flying scale, were not provided at the back of forging hammer(s): Scale guards made of sheet metal and used at the back of forging hammers were not adequate to prevent employees from being struck by hot, flying scale. One of the scale guards had a large vertical separation in it. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.218 A03 IX
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(3)(ix): Scale guards of substantial construction, arranged to stop flying scale, were not provided at the back of forging press(es): Scale guards made of sheet metal and used at the back of the trim presses were not adequate to prevent employees from being struck by hot, flying scale. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.218 A02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $28000.00 · Current $28000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(a)(2)(ii): There was no scheduling and recording of inspections of guards and point of operation protection devices at frequent and regular intervals for forging machine(s): On or about September 22, 2011, the employer did not perform and record inspections of guards and point of operation protection devices on forging machines, including the guards on foot pedals for hammers and presses. On or about September 22, 2011, the employer did not perform and record inspections of guards and point of operation devices on forging machines, including the guards on foot pedals for hammers and presses. The foot pedal on Hammer #9 was not effectively protected from unintended operation. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $28000
- — Z (W) $28000
1910.218 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $28000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.218(b)(2): The foot operated device(s) of forging machine(s) were not substantially and effectively protected from unintended operation: On or about September 22, 2011, the guard covering the foot pedal for Hammer No. 9 did not substantially and effectively protect the unintended operation of the hammer in that the operator could step on the guard and the guard would depress the foot pedal, activating the hammer. The hammer operator was exposed to an amputation hazard by the unintended hammer activation. No abatement documentation or certification is needed for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $0
- — Z (W) $28000
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness. On or about September 22, 2011, the employer did not use an equivalent form as the OSHA Form 301 to document a work related injury. The Supervisor's Injury Investigation/Loss Source Identification form did not collect and record the following information as collected on the OSHA 301: 1. Employee's address, date of birth, date hired, and gender; 2. The name of the treating health care professional, treatment facility name and address; 3. If the employee was treated in the emergency room; 4. If the employee was hospitalized overnight as an in-patient; 5. A description of what the employee was doing just before the incident occured; 6. A description of what happend that lead to the incident. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $600
More inspections at KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY
CORTLAND, IL—2012-12-04 00:00:00
KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY
View KISHWAUKEE FORGE COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332111)
BENSALEM, PA—2026-06-16
SPECIALTY RING PRODUCTS, INC.
NEW BOSTON, MI—2026-05-12
ALCORTA USA INC
AMHERST, NY—2026-05-11
INDUSTRIAL WELDING & FABRICATING CO
WORCESTER, MA—2026-05-06
KOMTEK FORGE LLC
MC KENZIE, TN—2026-04-28
HAVEN STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331069401.