Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADVANCED PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS in 311 FOREST, SHEBOYGAN FALLS, WI 53085 (NAICS 424610). OSHA activity number 331070441.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Prototype Systems for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Prototype Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
311 FOREST
City
SHEBOYGAN FALLS
State
WI
ZIP
53085
Mailing
311 FOREST, SHEBOYGAN FALLS, WI 53085
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424610
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2011
Abate by
Jan 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a lift truck:    a)    Employee who operated lift truck had not received training in the detail required by the standard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2011
Abate by
Jan 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a)    Employer did not have a written hazard communication program.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2011
Abate by
Jan 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    a)    Small chemical containers setting on sink counter without labels to identify chemical inside.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2011
Abate by
Jan 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:      Small chemical containers sitting on the sink counter did not have a label containing a hazard warning.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2011
Abate by
Jan 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a)    No training was provided for hazard communication by the company.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331070441.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.