CENTENNIAL, CO —
OSHA Inspection: ROCKY MOUNTAIN URGENT CARE, PC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROCKY MOUNTAIN URGENT CARE, PC in 20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD, CENTENNIAL, CO 80015 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 331070540.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROCKY MOUNTAIN URGENT CARE, PC
- Site address
- 20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD
- City
- CENTENNIAL
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80015
- Mailing
- 20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD, CENTENNIAL, CO 80015
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 622110
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,607 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed an updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure: a) On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards because the employer did not annually review the Exposure Control Plan to ensure that it was effectively implemented and did not annually evaluate new technologies and safer medical devices and update the plan to reflect changes made to reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1606.5
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who were potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan: a) On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not request input on the Exposure Control Plan from non-managerial employees performing patient care. No documentation of employee participation was included in the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D03 III
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment in the appropriate sizes was readily accessible at the worksite or issued to employees: a) On or about September 15, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not ensure that employees responding to a large blood spill were adequately protected from contaminating their skin, street clothes or undergarments through the use of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2677.5
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in paragraph (g)(2)(vii)[l] and within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employees who have occupational exposure unless the employee had previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, antibody testing had revealed that the employee was immune, or the vaccine was contraindicated for medical reasons: a) On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not ensure that all employees had either received a hepatitis vaccination, were immune, or had signed a record indicating their refusal to be vaccinated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F03
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3): Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation and follow-up, including at least the following elements: a) On or about September 15, 2011, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not immediately follow an exposure incident with a confidential medical evaluation for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(iv): Annual training for all employees was not provided within one year of their previous training: a) On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not provide effective annual training to each employee on the details of the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii) The training program did not contain at a minimum the elements contained in paragraph (g)(2)(vii)[A] through [N]: a) On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not provide effective training that contained: 1. An accessible copy of the regulatory test of this standard and an explanation of its contents; 2. An explanation of the employers exposure control plan and the means by which the employee can obtain a copy of the written plan; and 3. Information on the appropriate actions to take and persons to contact in an emergency involving blood or other potentially infections materials.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 622110)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331070540.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.