Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROCKY MOUNTAIN URGENT CARE, PC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROCKY MOUNTAIN URGENT CARE, PC in 20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD, CENTENNIAL, CO 80015 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 331070540.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rocky Mountain Urgent Care, PC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rocky Mountain Urgent Care, PC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD
City
CENTENNIAL
State
CO
ZIP
80015
Mailing
20270 E. SMOKY HILL ROAD, CENTENNIAL, CO 80015
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622110
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,607 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv):  The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed an updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure:    a)  On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards because the employer did not annually review the Exposure Control Plan to ensure that it was effectively implemented and did not annually evaluate new technologies and safer medical devices and update the plan to reflect changes made to reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1606.5
  • — Z (S) $2295

1910.1030 C01 V

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v):  The employer did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who were potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan:      a)  On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not request input on the Exposure Control Plan from non-managerial employees performing patient care.  No documentation of employee participation was included in the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(iii):  The employer did not ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment in the appropriate sizes was readily accessible at the worksite or issued to employees:    a)  On or about September 15, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not ensure that employees responding to a large blood spill were adequately protected from contaminating their skin, street clothes or undergarments through the use of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2677.5
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i):  Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in paragraph (g)(2)(vii)[l] and within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employees who have occupational exposure unless the employee had previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, antibody testing had revealed that the employee was immune, or the vaccine was contraindicated for medical reasons:    a)     On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not ensure that all employees had either received a hepatitis vaccination, were immune, or had signed a record indicating their refusal to be vaccinated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3):  Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation and follow-up, including at least the following elements:      a)  On or about September 15, 2011, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not immediately follow an exposure incident with a confidential medical evaluation for the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(iv):  Annual training for all employees was not provided within one year of their previous training:    a)   On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not provide effective annual training to each employee on the details of the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2012
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)  The training program did not contain at a minimum the elements contained in paragraph (g)(2)(vii)[A] through [N]:      a)   On or about September 27, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because the employer did not provide effective training that contained:    1.  An accessible copy of the regulatory test of this standard and an explanation of its contents;  2.  An explanation of the employers exposure control plan and the means by which the employee can obtain a copy of the written plan; and  3.  Information on the appropriate actions to take and persons to contact in an emergency involving blood or other potentially infections materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331070540.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.