Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WEATHERGUARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WEATHERGUARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC in 9114 WEST WARREN DRIVE, LAKEWOOD, CO 80227 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331073460.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Weatherguard Construction Company INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Weatherguard Construction Company INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9114 WEST WARREN DRIVE
City
LAKEWOOD
State
CO
ZIP
80227
Mailing
7012 SOUTH REVERE PARKWAY SUITE 100, CENTENNIAL, CO 80112
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 26, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:    (a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subconstractor, protected their employees from fall hazards while using an extension ladder for access to roof area, that was placed on loose rocks.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6600
  • — Z (S) $6600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 26, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,600 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from head injuires while working in areas on both the ground and on the roof while old shingles and pieces of sheet metal were being tossed around and where no head protection was in use.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (R) $6600
  • — Z (R) $6600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 26, 2011
Penalty
Initial $8,800 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from eye injury while being exposed to flying shingle and sheet metal particles and using pneumatic guns without eye protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (R) $8800
  • — Z (R) $8800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2011
Abate by
Oct 26, 2011
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activites 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:    a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from falls in excess of 9 feet while removing shingles from a roof area without fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (R) $15400
  • — Z (R) $15400

View Weatherguard Construction Company INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331073460.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.