Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: LENTZ FARMS, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LENTZ FARMS, INC in 165 13 1/2 STREET, DALLAS, WI 54733 (NAICS 493130). OSHA activity number 331074302.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lentz Farms, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lentz Farms, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LENTZ FARMS, INC
Site address
165 13 1/2 STREET
City
DALLAS
State
WI
ZIP
54733
Mailing
1322 1-1/2 AVENUE, RIDGELAND, WI 54763
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Mar 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):  Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a)  Truck bay:  Mechanical pits that measured 9 feet 8 inches to the lower level on the east and west sides of the truck bay were not guarded to prevent falls by a standard guard rail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1080
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.23 C02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Mar 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(2):  Runways four feet or more above floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent) and toeboards:    (a)  Truck bay; Catwalks/runways over mechanical pits that measured approximately 9 feet 8 inches to the lower level on the east and west sides of the truck bay were not guarded to prevent falls by a standard guard rail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Mar 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):  Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    (a)  Throughout the facility;  The employer did provide machine guarding of pulleys such as, but not limited to:  1.  East side of truck bay;  One electric motor, belt and pulley drive at the end of the catwalk, and  2.  West side of truck bay; two electric motor, belt and pulley drives adjacent to catwalks near the top of the mechanical pit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Mar 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):  Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    (a)  Throughout the facility;  The employer did provide machine guarding of belts such as, but not limited to:  1.  East side of truck bay;  One electric motor, belt and pulley drive at the end of the catwalk, and  2.  West side of truck bay; two electric motor, belt and pulley drives adjacent to catwalks near the top of the mechanical pit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.272 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(iv):  The employer did not prohibit walking down grain and similar practices where the employee walks on grain to make it flow within or out from a grain storage structure, or where an employee is on moving grain:    (a)  GSI grain bins; Employees were directed to walk down corn in the GSI grain bin which was approximately 12 to 14 feet deep in order to make it flow to the floor holes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.272 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(2):  When entering the grain handling facility bins, silos, or tanks from the top, employees did not wear a body harness with lifeline, or use a boatswain's chair that met the requirements of Subpart D, 29 CFR 1910.28(j):    (a)  Grain bins throughout the facility; Employees entered grain bins to obtain temperature readings and moisture content and did not wear a body harness or use a boatswain's chair.  The grain bins were filled with approximately 18 feet of corn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.272 G03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(3):  In the grain handling facility an observer, equipped to provide assistance, was not stationed outside the bin, silo, or tank being entered by an employee:    (a)  Grain bins throughout the facility; The employer did not provide an observer equipped to provide assistance, stationed outside the grain bins and able to maintain communication when grain bin entries were preformed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.272 G04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(4):  The employer did not provide equipment for rescue operations, which was specifically suited for the bin, silo, or tank being entered:    (a)  Grain bins throughout the facility; The employer did not provide equipment suited for rescue operations when grain bin entries were preformed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 B07 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i):  Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:    (a)  Throughout the facility;  Covers and knockouts were missing in electrical boxes, raceways, and cabinets such as but not limited to:  1.  Mechanical/electrical room; The main electrical cabinet cover, the electrical raceway cover and the junction box cover, and  2.  Main office; Missing breaker knockouts in the southwest corner breaker box.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1):  Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a)  Corn drying sampler; A flexible cord used to supply power to the corn drying sampler had broken insulation that exposed conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):      (a)  Corn drying sampler; The electrical circuitry used to power the corn drying sampler was not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures exposing employees to open electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.272 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(iii):  The atmosphere within a bin, silo, or tank in the grain handling facility was not tested for oxygen content prior to employee entry:    (a)  Throughout the facility; The employer did not test the grain bin atmosphere for oxygen content prior entry or provide continuous forced-air ventilation before and during the period when employees were inside.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.272 M03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Jan 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.272(m)(3):  A certification record maintained of each inspection by the employer in the grain facility was not in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.272(1):    (a)  Main office; Required maintenance certifications were not recorded on each maintenance inspection of the grain handling equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Lentz Farms, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331074302.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.