Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, INC. in 1600 GLEN LAKE AVE., ITASCA, IL 60143 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 331075861.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch National Industrial Coatings, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for National Industrial Coatings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1600 GLEN LAKE AVE.
City
ITASCA
State
IL
ZIP
60143
Mailing
1600 GLEN LAKE AVE., ITASCA, IL 60143
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
37
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,410 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    On 10/12/11, in the U.V. Room, two pallets were strapped to the elevated walkway so employees could access a tank hatch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2079
  • · Z (S) $4410

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered.    In the Resin Room, employee pumps ammonium hydroxide into a miixing tank and his body is not protected in the event a hose breaks and sprays the corrosive liquid into the room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2079
  • · Z (S) $3150

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 37 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    National Industrial Coatings, Itasca, IL:  A work place hazard assessment had not been completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2079
  • · Z (S) $3150

1910.138 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(b): Employer did not base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified.    National Industrial Coatings, Itasca, IL:  Employees in batch making were provided latex gloves as protection for all  chemicals without evaluating the effectiveness of the protection offered.  Chemicals include but are not limited to ethanol, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, styrene acrylic polymers, and ammonium hydroxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    In the Resin Room, employee was working with ammonium hydroxide and the nearest eye wash and emergency shower  was not in the immediate work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2079
  • · Z (S) $3150

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 17 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii):     Training did not consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace.    The driving skills of fork lift drivers had not been evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2520

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.     National Industrial Coatings, Itasca, IL:  Employees in Batch Making were required to use either a full or half mask air purifying respirators and were not provided with a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    Employees in Batch Making were required to use respiratory protection and had not been provided with a medical evaluation.      Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):     The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    Batch Makers were assigned and required to use half or full face air purifying respirators and were not fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i):     Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:    On 10/12/11, in the Resin Room, the employees fulllface respirator was stored by hanging it on the exit door's latch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k):     The employer did not provide employees, required to use respiratory protection, training on the use and care of the equipment.    Employee working in the Resin Room, was required to wear a fullface respirator and had not been provided with training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 37 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2011
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     Employees use hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to ammonium hydroxide, ethanol, and resins, and had not been provided with a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View National Industrial Coatings, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331075861.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.