Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DELUCA, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DELUCA, INC. in 1304 PHILLIPS ST., MISSOULA, MT 59801 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331077693.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Deluca, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Deluca, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DELUCA, INC.
Site address
1304 PHILLIPS ST.
City
MISSOULA
State
MT
ZIP
59801
Mailing
826 POPLAR, MISSOULA, MT 59802
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2011
Abate by
Dec 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):     Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2011
Abate by
Dec 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):     Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2011
Abate by
Dec 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $3600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2011
Abate by
Dec 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2011
Abate by
Dec 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Deluca, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331077693.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.