WHITEFISH, MT ·
OSHA Inspection: SANARIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of SANARIS ENTERPRISES LLC in 310 SUGARBOWL CIRCLE, WHITEFISH, MT 59937 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 331077735.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANARIS ENTERPRISES LLC
- Site address
- 310 SUGARBOWL CIRCLE
- City
- WHITEFISH
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59937
- Mailing
- 487 TAMARACK MEADOW RD., WHITEFISH, MT 59937
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): Means of egress from trench excavations. A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that are 4 feet (1.22 m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62 m) of lateral travel for employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Employees were not protected from excavated or other materials or equipment that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling into excavations. Protection was not provided by placing and keeping such materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61 m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that are sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could result in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions. An inspection was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift. Inspections shall also be made after every rainstorm or other hazard increasing occurrence. These inspections are only required when employee exposure can be reasonably anticipated.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331077735.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.