Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: MAC LTT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MAC LTT, INC. in 1400 FAIRCHILD AVE., KENT, OH 44240 (NAICS 336212). OSHA activity number 331077750.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MAC LTT, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MAC LTT, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAC LTT, INC.
Site address
1400 FAIRCHILD AVE.
City
KENT
State
OH
ZIP
44240
Mailing
1400 FAIRCHILD AVE., KENT, OH 44240
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336212
Employees
40
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about January 5, 2012, the employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear powered air purifying welding helmets while welding in confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about January 5, 2012, medical evaluations had not been performed for employees required to wear powered air purifying welding helmets while welding in confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3):     Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:     On or about January 5, 2012, respirator training was not conducted for employees required to wear powered air purifying welding helmets while welding in confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4):     When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer did not have a written permit required confined space program for employees who enter into frac tanks and aluminum tanker cars to perform welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.146 D04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(i):     Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not ensure that employees used the testing and monitoring equipment properly:    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer did not require the employees to perform a bump check on their 4 gas meter, (Gas Alert Micro Clip XT) which reads CO, H2S, Oxygen, and LEL%, before using the meter to evaluate safe entry conditions or for personal monitoring.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.146 D05 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i):     Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing conditions in the permit space to determine  if acceptable entry conditions existed before entry was authorized to begin:    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer did not re-test the atmosphere before entering the permit required confined spaces after periods of inactivity such as lunch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.146 D09

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9):     Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and for preventing unauthorized personnel from attempting a rescue:    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer did not develop and train employees on how to call for rescue services or how to perform a rescue for the emplolyees entering into permit spaces such as the frac tanks and the aluminum tankers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.252 B04 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(4)(iv):    Where the welder must enter a confined space through a manhole or other small opening, means were not provided for quickly removing the welder in case of emergency.    On or about October 17, 2011, no rescue equipment was provided for employees who enter into frac tanks and aluminum tankers through manholes and baffle openings.        In the alternative, 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(viii):     Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employees, rescue and emergency equipment needed to comply with 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9):    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer did not provide rescue and emergency equipment including but not limited to lifelines, wristlets, and full body harnesses for employees performing welding operations in the permit required confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.252 B04 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(4)(iv):    An attendant with a preplanned rescue procedure was not stationed outside a confined space opening to observe the welder at all times in case of emergency.     On or about October 17, 2011, the attendant was allowed to perform other duties and did not observe the welder when he was in the confined space at all times.        In the alternative, 29 CFR 1910.146(i)(10):     The employer did not ensure that each attendant performed no duties that could interfere with the attendant's primary duty to monitor and protect the authorized entrants:    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer allowed the attendants to perform other work duties and as a result no one was continuously monitoring the authorized entrants in the tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii):     29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:    On or about October 17, 2011, in the assembly area, the employer did not provide welding screens to protect employees working across the aisle from welders and employees working on the same trailer as welders from arc flash.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 28 instances 28 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Mar 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):     The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    On or about October 17, 2011, employees were provided dust masks to wear voluntarily, but were not provided the information in Appendix D of 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1):     The employer did not determine, in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section,  the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    On or about October 17, 2011, the employer failed to perform initial air monitoring for employees who weld using metals that contain chromium which can expose employees to chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View MAC LTT, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331077750.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.