PUEBLO, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: DAN'S PAINT & BODY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DAN'S PAINT & BODY in 1900 E. 4TH ST. #2, PUEBLO, CO 81001 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 331079061.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAN'S PAINT & BODY
- Site address
- 1900 E. 4TH ST. #2
- City
- PUEBLO
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81001
- Mailing
- 1900 E. 4TH ST. #2, PUEBLO, CO 81001
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was not established and implemented at the workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer: a) On or about October 20, 2011 and times prior, the employer had not established and implemented a written Respiratory Protection program. Abatement Note: The respiratory protection programs shall include the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i)-(ix). Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1080
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): A medical evaluation was not provided to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit-tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about October 20, 2011 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees were required to wear tight-fitting respirators prior to obtaining a medical evaluation. Abatement Note: The medical evaluation shall obtain the information requested by the questionnaire in Sections 1 and 2, Part A of Appendix C of this standard. A physician or other licensed health care professional shall evaluate the questionnaire. Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, and at least annually thereafter: a) On or about October 20, 2011 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees were required to wear a tight-fitting respirator prior to being fit tested. Abatement Note: Fit testing shall follow the requirements listed in 29 CFR 1910.134(f). Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1052 D01 I
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i): Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure: a) On or about October 20, 2011 and times prior, the employer had not determined employee's exposure to methylene chloride by taking a personal breathing zone air sample. Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) On or about October 20, 2011 and times prior, a written Hazard Communication program was not implemented for employees exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to toluene. Abatement Note: A hazard communication program includes employee training as well as a written program including material safety data sheet and a master list of all chemicals. Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331079061.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.