CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: TWIN TOWERS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TWIN TOWERS in 5343 HAMILTON AVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45224 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 331079764.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TWIN TOWERS
- Site address
- 5343 HAMILTON AVE
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45224
- Mailing
- 5343 HAMILTON AVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45224
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 320
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of every workroom shall be maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition.Where wet processes are used, drainage shall be maintained, and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places should be provided wherepracticable. a) The employer failed to maintain floors as clean and dry as far as possible in the Dining/Kitchen Area and Nursing Areas (Assist Living, Health Services, etc.); in which resulted into multiiple recordable slip/fall injuries; three recordable injuries in 2008, two recordable injuries in 2009, three recordable injuries in 2010, and eight recordable injuries in 2011.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6000
1910.1030 C01 II
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The Exposure Control Plan shall contain at least the following elements outlined in 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (C): The employer did not ensure that the facility's written bloodborne exposure control plan contained the elements as required in 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) - (C) such as but not limited to: a) The employer failed to reviewed and/or updated the exposure control plan since June of 2006. b) The employer failed to identify safer needle devices used within the facility inside the exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): Document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure. a) The employer did not ensure annual consideration and implementation of safer needle devices were been completed and did not provided documentation of these evaluations for the past three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls shall be used to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. Where occupational exposure remains after institution of these controls, personal protective equipment shall also be used. a) The employer failed to provided adequate engineering and work practice controls to eliminate employee exposure in which employees are required to adminster insulin with a non-safer needle device, Walgreens Super Thin II Syringes 0.3mL.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.1030 F05 III
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(5)(iii): All other findings or diagnoses shall remain confidential and shall not be included in the written report. a) The employer did not ensure that the medical findings and diagnoses provided by the healthcare professional following needlestick injuries remained confidential in which would prevent the employer from obtaining the exposed employee and source individual test results for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.1030 H05 I
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i): The employer shall establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps. The information in the sharps injury log shall be recorded and maintained in such manner as to protect the confidentiality of the injured employee. The sharps injury log shall contain, at a minimum: a) The employer had not established and/or maintained a sharps log for the recording of injuries involving contaminated sharps in which woulf describe the type and brand of the device, where the exposure incident occurred, and a description of the incident.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1904.29 B06
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(6): Employee(s) names were not removed from the 300 Log when employee(s) experienced privacy concern cases. a) On or about May 20, 2011 an employee received a needlestick injury while discarding a needle into a sharps container and the case was not marked as a privacy case on the OSHA 300 Log for the calendar year of 2011. b) On or about June 15, 2011 an employee received a needlestick injury while trying to pull the safety shield over the needle and the case was not marked as a privacy case on the OSHA 300 Log for the calendar year of 2011. c) On or about August 12, 2011 an employee received a needlestick injury while discarding a needle into a sharps container and the case was not marked as a privacy case on the OSHA 300 Log for the calendar year of 2011. d) On or about October 2, 2011 an employee received a needlestick injury while giving a resident an injection and the case was not marked as a privacy case on the OSHA 300 Log for the calendar year of 2011.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $1000
1910.132 H01
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Except as provided by paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(6) of this section, the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, shall be provided by the employer at no cost to employees. a) The employer failed to provide personal protective equipment such as required non-slip or slip proof shoes at no cost to the employees to prevent slip/fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communicationprogram which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning,material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following: a) A written Hazardous Communication Program had not been developed by the employer to educate employees on the physical and chemical hazards presented by the chemicals in the worplace such as but not limiited to Ecolabs' Wash n' Walk, Oasis 137 Surface Cleaner Degreaser, Oasis 122 Cleaner and Degreaser Concentrate, Oasis 146 Multi Quat Sanitizer, and Kook Klene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Twin Towers
View Twin Towers's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331079764.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.