CANTON, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: ALLIED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALLIED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. in 225 S. 3RD, CANTON, IL 61520 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 331080200.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLIED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 225 S. 3RD
- City
- CANTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61520
- Mailing
- 2300 S.W. ADAMS STREET, PEORIA, IL 61602
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236210
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports: An employee working from a mobile scaffold installing dens glass sheathing was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet and the level that the employee worked from was not fully planked between the uprights or guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3430
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral pre-fabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used: An employee working from a mobile scaffold installing dens glass sheathing was climbing the frame of the scaffold to gain access to the working platform. Acceptable means of access on an off the mobile scaffold was not provided for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $3500
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: An employee was working from a mobile scaffold which was not erected or supervised under the direction of someone acting in the capacity of a competent person before employees were allowed to access the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operation, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: An employee was working from a mobile scaffold installing dens glass sheathing and the platform did not have a guard rail on the sides and the employer had not provided training to the employee on the nature of the scaffold hazards and the design criteria and the intended use of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling: An employee working from a mobile scaffold installing dens glass sheathing was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet and the employees was not protected from falling because there was no top rail and mid rail.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3430
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: An employee was working from a mobile scaffold installing dens glass sheathing and the employer had not provided training to the employee on the hazards associated with working off of the scaffolding and procedures to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.452 W02
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: An employee was exposed to falling up to approximately 20 feet while riding on a mobile scaffold to install dens glass sheathing because the caster wheels where not locked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.452 W03
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(3): Manual force used to move the scaffold shall be applied as close to the base as practicable, but not more than 5 feet (1.5 m) above the supporting surface: An employee was exposed to falling up to approximately 20 feet while working from a mobile scaffold to install dens glass sheathing because the employee moved the scaffold while the employee where on the scaffold at approximately 20 feet above the working level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: An employee was retrieving and cutting pieces of metal to be used for the installation of the parapet was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24 feet and the employee was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3430
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.501 B04 II
- Issued
- Nov 25, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet because the ladder used to access the third floor was positioned next to a floor hole and the employees were required to step over the cables and walking/working surfaces was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3430
- · Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Allied Construction Services, INC.
View Allied Construction Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236210)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331080200.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.