Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER, LLC in 1809 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, NORMAL, IL 61761 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 331080325.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Automatic Fire Sprinkler, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Automatic Fire Sprinkler, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1809 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE
City
NORMAL
State
IL
ZIP
61761
Mailing
1809 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, NORMAL, IL 61761
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while standing on the top of a storage box to cut pieces of wood, installing pieces of 2x4 boards to level up the end of the building, and installing pieces of metal on top of the trusses. A competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while standing on the top of a storage box to cut pieces of wood; installing pieces of 2x4 boards to level up the end of the building, and installing pieces of metal on top of the trusses and the employee was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    b.  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet while installing pieces metal on top of the trusses and the employee was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards which enables each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard approximately 8 feet while standing on the top of a storage box to cut pieces of wood, installing pieces of 2x4 boards to level up the end of the building, and installing pieces metal on top of the trusses. The employee was not provided training which would have enabled him to recognize the hazards of falling and provided him with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and  the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9.8 feet to the ground below when using a ladder to access the top of the trusses to install pieces of metal because the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.1053 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):     The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 8 feet to the ground below when using a stepladder to access the top of the trusses to install pieces of metal and the top step of the stepladder was used as a step.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 8.4 feet to the ground below when using a step ladder that was leaned against a metal storage box and the self-supporting legs were not open and the ladder was used for purpose other than purpose for which it was designed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2011
Abate by
Dec 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):     The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331080325.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.