Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: VALUGARD AUTO PROCESSING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VALUGARD AUTO PROCESSING, LLC in 11332 TAMARCO DRIVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45242 (NAICS 325612). OSHA activity number 331080416.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valugard Auto Processing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valugard Auto Processing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11332 TAMARCO DRIVE
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45242
Mailing
8855 BLUE ASH ROAD, CINCINNATI, OH 45242
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325612
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Dec 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Where employees were required to wear Moldex 8000 series half face respirators while spraying undercoat on motor vehicles, the employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program which contained:    (a)  Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace;  (b)  Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators;  (c)  Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators;  (d)  Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations;  (e)  Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators;  (f)  Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations;  (g)  Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and  (i)  Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Dec 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (e), (f), (g) and (h):    Where employees worked with hazardous chemicals, such as vehicle undercoat, rust proofer, window cleaner, the employer did not implement a written hazard communication program which contained:    (a)  A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using an identity that is referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet (the list may be compiled for the workplace as a whole or for individual work areas);  (b)  Labeling requirements for chemicals used in the workplace;  (c)  The location of MSDS in the facility;  (d)  Methods and schedules to be implemented for employee information and training;  (e)  The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks (for example, the cleaning of reactor vessels), and the hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas.  (f)  Information for employees of other employers, such as construction contractor working on-site, about hazardous chemical son site, labeling requirements, MSDS and the methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.132 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2011
Abate by
Nov 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 02902270

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    (a)  The employer did not perform personal protective equipment assessments for employees who were exposed to asphalt, hydrocarbons, petroleum distillates and Stoddard solvent while they worked spraying undercoat, washing, waxing and cleaning the interior of new vehicles at Valugard Auto Processing, LLC.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331080416.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.