Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: O & G SPRING AND WIRE FORM SPECIALTY CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of O & G SPRING AND WIRE FORM SPECIALTY CO. in 4500 W. DIVISION STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60651 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 331081513.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch O & G Spring and Wire Form Specialty CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for O & G Spring and Wire Form Specialty CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4500 W. DIVISION STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60651
Mailing
4500 W. DIVISION STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60651
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Jan 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.Note: Exception: The employer need not document the required procedure for a particular machine or equipment, when all of the following elements exist: (1) The machine or equipment has no potential for stored or residual energy or reaccumulation of stored energy after shut down which could endanger employees; (2) the machine or equipment has a single energy source which can be readily identified and isolated; (3) the isolation and locking out of that energy source will completely deenergize and deactivate the machine or equipment; (4) the machine or equipment is isolated from that energy source and locked out during servicing or maintenance; (5) a single lockout device will achieve a locker-out condition; (6) the lockout device is under the exclusive control of the authorized employee performing the servicing or maintenance; (7) the servicing or maintenance does not create hazards for other employees; and (8) the employer, in utilizing this exception, has had no accidents involving the unexpected activation or reenergization of the machine or equipment during servicing or maintenance.    Throughout facility - On or about September 13, 2011, procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control  of potentially hazardous energy, thereby exposing employees to the unexpected re-energization of machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Jan 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.    Throughout facility - On or about September 13, 2011, the employer had not performed periodic inspections to ensure that documented lockout/tagout procedures were being followed by authorized employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Dec 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefore, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    a.  Throughout facility - On or about September 13, 2011, the employer had not installed guarding for the Verson press brake No. 204, thereby exposing employees to the point of operation and amputation injuries.    b.  Throughout facility - On or about September 13, 2011, the employer had not installed guarding for press brake No. 5, thereby exposing employees to the point of operation and amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.217 B04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(4)(i): The pedal mechanism shall be protected to prevent unintended operation from falling or moving objects or by accidental stepping onto the pedal.    Throughout facility - On or about September 13, 2011, the pedal mechanisms on punch press # 2 were not guarded to prevent unintended operation, thereby exposing employees to crushing and/or amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.219 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Guarding. Pulleys, any parts of which are seven (7) feet or less from the floor or working platform, shall be guarded in accordance with the standards specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section. Pulleys serving as balance wheels (e.g., punch presses) on which the point of contact between belt and pulley is more than six feet six inches (6 ft. 6 in.) from the floor or platform may be guarded with a disk covering the spokes.    Production Department - On or about September 13, 2011, the pulleys on the Toledo press brake # 5 were not guarded completely, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4620

1910.219 E01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Where both runs of horizontal belts are seven (7) feet or less from the floor level, the guard shall extend to at least fifteen (15) inches above the belt or to a standard height, except that where both runs of a horizontal belt are 42 inches or less from the floor, the belt shall be fully enclosed in accordance with paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section.    Production Department - On or about September 13, 2011, the horizontal belts on the Toledo press brake # 5 were not guarded completely, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $770 · Current $385 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): What do I need to do to complete the OSHA 300 Log? You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year.    Record keeping - On or about September 13, 2011, at the above located workplace, the employer's OSHA 300 forms for 2010 and 2009, was not completed in detail as required  by 1904.4 through 1904.12.  In that:      a.  The OSHA 300 log for 2010 did not include what directly injured or made the person ill.  b.  The OSHA 300 log for 2009 did not include what directly injured or made the person ill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $385
  • — Z (O) $770

1904.32 B03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3): How do I certify the annual summary? A company executive must certify that he or she has examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believes, based on his or her knowledge of the process by which the information was recorded, that the annual summary is correct and complete.    a.  Recordkeeping - On or about September 13, 2011, the employer's OSHA 300a Summary for 2010 were not certified for accuracy as required.      b.  Recordkeeping - On or about September 13, 2011, the employer's OSHA 300a Summary for 2009 were not certified for accuracy as required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View O & G Spring and Wire Form Specialty CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331081513.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.