Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DAN ROMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAN ROMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC in 11453 WEST HIAWATHA DRIVE, BOISE, ID 83711 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 331081679.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DAN Roman Construction, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DAN Roman Construction, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11453 WEST HIAWATHA DRIVE
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83711
Mailing
10300 NORTH HWY 52, HORSESHOE BEND, ID 83629
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Abate by
Nov 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:     a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto employees performed framing activities, which included installing trusses, from the exterior top plates without a fall protection system in place exposing them to fall hazards ranging from approximately 10 feet to 19 and a half feet.      b) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto employees performing framing activities on the second floor level were exposed an approximate 13 and a half foot fall hazard at unguarded window openings.      c) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto employees performing framing activities were exposed to an open sided floor at the top of the stairway when accessing the second floor.    Note) Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee had been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used:    a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto the responsible person on site and employees performing framing activities did not recognize the hazards of working from exterior top plates, unguarded wall openings, and open sided floors, and take actions to minimize or eliminate these hazards.      Note) Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Other-than-serious 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having more than four risers or rising more than 30 inches was not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:      a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto the interior stairway used for access to and from the second level did not have a stairrail system in place.  Stairway had approximately 16 risers.    Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.1053 B13

Other-than-serious 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Abate by
Nov 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto an employee performing framing activities which included setting trusses, stood on the top cap of an estimated eight foot self supporting ladder.      Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A01 III

Other-than-serious 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Abate by
Nov 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders:    a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto the responsible person on site and employees performing framing activities did not ackowledge the hazard of an unprotected stairway and landing, and take the minimum actions to eliminate or minimize the hazard.    b) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 and times prior thereto the responsible person and employee(s) on site did not acknowledge the hazard of improper use of a self supporting ladder and take action to eliminate or minimize the hazard.     Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.95 B

Other-than-serious 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2011
Abate by
Nov 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.95(b): Where employees provide their own protective equipment, the employer did not assure its adequacy, including proper maintenance, and sanitation of such equipment:    a) Jobsite: On October 25, 2011 eyewear worn by employees performing framing activities, which included the use of a nail gun, did not met the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z87.1-1968 requirements.      Note) Abatement certifiaction IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331081679.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.