MENTOR, OH —
OSHA Inspection: TRAILER COMPONENT MFG., INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TRAILER COMPONENT MFG., INC. in 8120 TYLER BLVD., MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 336399). OSHA activity number 331083329.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRAILER COMPONENT MFG., INC.
- Site address
- 8120 TYLER BLVD.
- City
- MENTOR
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44060
- Mailing
- 8120 TYLER BLVD., MENTOR, OH 44060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336399
- Employees
- 120
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,095 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized: a) A employee working in the blasting booth was exposed to continuous noise at 238% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 415 minute sampling period on 12/28/2011; exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 65 minutes not sampled. b) A employee working in the blasting booth was exposed to continuous noise at 235% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 418 minute sampling period on 12/28/2011; exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 62 minutes not sampled. Abatement Steps: 1. Effective hearing protection shall be provided and used by all exposed employees as an interim protection measure and when administrative or engineering controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of table G-16. In addition, an effective hearing conservation program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95(c) thru (n) shall be maintained. Abatement must be completed (5 Working Days) 2. Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and /or administrative measures to control employee exposure to noise as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. a) Evaluation of engineering control options. b) Selection of optimum control method and completion of design. c) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures. d) Testing and acceptance or modifications/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent Industrial Hygienist or other technically qualified person. Abatement must be completed (15 working days) 3. Abatement should have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Abatement must be completed (30 working days)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4095
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.95 G08 II B
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(B): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, that for employees already using hearing protectors, employees be refitted and retrained in the use of hearing protectors and provided with hearing protectors offering greater attenuation if necessary: On or about October 27, 2011 two employees with a standard threshold shift were not retrained and refitted on hearing protectors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.95 G08 II C
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(C): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, the employee was referred for a clinical audiological evaluation or an ontological examination, as appropriate, if additional testing is necessary or if the employer suspects that a medical pathology of the ear is caused or aggravated by wearing of hearing protectors: On or about October 27, 2011 one employee with a standard threshold shift was not referred for futher examination such as a otological exam.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable: On or about October 27, 2011 the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees including but not limited to those who are required to wear a respirator when abrasive blasting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. On or about October 27, 2011 the employees required to use respirators, including but not limited to abrasive blasters had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): Employee(s) were exposed to respirable dust in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of 5.0 mg/m3 listed in Table Z-3: a) On or about December 28, 2011, the abrasive blaster working with aluminum oxide shot was exposed to respirable dust at 15.12 mg/m3 which is approximately 3.024 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3. b) On or about December 28, 2011, the abrasive blaster working with aluminum oxide shot was exposed to respirable dust at 8.099 mg/m3 which is approximately 1.620 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2925
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented for the employees including the abrasive blaster to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): For the employees including, but not limited to , those as described in Citation 1, Item 4(a). a) On or about December 28, 2011, the abrasive blaster working with aluminum oxide shot was exposed to respirable dust at 15.12 mg/m3 which is approximately 3.024 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3. b) On or about December 28, 2011, the abrasive blaster working with aluminum oxide shot was exposed to respirable dust at 8.099 mg/m3 which is approximately 1.620 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3. General methods of control applicable in these circumstances inslude, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Installing a downdraft exhaust system at the manual abrasive blasting booth that averages 80 fpm over the entire floor. 2) Installing a cross ventilation system at the manual abrasive blasting booth that average 100 fpm velocity over the vertical cross section of the room. 3) Administratively roteate employees to insure that exposures are below the allowable exposre limits for all air contaminants involved. 4) Provide adequate PPE to prohibit abrasive blasters from inhaling the dust. STEP 1: Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to the respirable dust permissible exposure limits. Abatement period by (5 working days) STEP 2: Submit to the area director a written, detail plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implemetation of engineering and/or administrative measure to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following action swhich must be consistend with the abatement dates required by this citation. Abatemend period by (15 working days) 1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; 2) Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; and 4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. STEP 3: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Abatement period by (30 working days)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.10 A
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.10(a): Basic requirement. If an employee's hearing test (audiogram) reveals that the employee has experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee's total hearing level is 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS, you must record the case on the OSHA 300 Log. On or about October 27, 2011 the employer did not record a Standard Threshold Shift on the companys OSHA 300 log.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Trailer Component MFG., INC.
View Trailer Component MFG., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336399)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331083329.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.