Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BLUNIER BUILDERS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BLUNIER BUILDERS, INC. in 1040 WEST CENTER STREET, EUREKA, IL 61530 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 331083428.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Blunier Builders, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Blunier Builders, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1040 WEST CENTER STREET
City
EUREKA
State
IL
ZIP
61530
Mailing
1230 US 24, EUREKA, IL 61530
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    Employees were operating a Terex Rough Terrain Forklift to move trusses and the seat belt was not being worn while the forklift was in operation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1960
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by successful completion of training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Employees were operating a Terex Telehandler Lull forklift and the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of training and evaluation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):     Powered industrial truck(s) with defect(s) or in any way unsafe had not been withdrawn from service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    Employees were exposed to being struck by a Terex Telehandler Lull forklift that was being operated to move trusses and the front window was broken.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet while installing trusses and bracing. The employees were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3430
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards which enables each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards:    Employees installing trusses and bracing were exposed to a fall hazard approximately15 feet to the ground below and the employees were not provided training which would have enabled them to recognize the hazards of falling and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):     The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph (l) and shall include the name of the operator, the date of training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:    Employees were operating a Terex Telehandler Lull forklift and the employer did not provide evidence to show that the required powered industrial training and evaluation had been conducted for the operator. There was no written documentation that included the operators name, date of the training, date of the evaluation and the name of the person conducting the training and/or evaluation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2012
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):     The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Blunier Builders, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331083428.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.