MAHOMET, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN MCCORKLE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KEVIN MCCORKLE in 404 E OAK STREET, MAHOMET, IL 61853 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331086454.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN MCCORKLE
- Site address
- 404 E OAK STREET
- City
- MAHOMET
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61853
- Mailing
- 302 TILTON PO BOX 16, IVESDALE, IL 61851
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provided an alternative fall protection measure: Employees replacing a residential roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 19 feet. No fall protection was utilized.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees replacing a residential roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 19 feet. A training program was not provided to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Employees using a portable step ladder to access a roof were exposed to fall hazards. The ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: Employees using a portable step ladder to access a roof were exposed to fall hazards. The employees had not been trained so far as to enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.403 B01
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: Employees replacing a residential roof were exposed to electrical hazards. The extension cord and outlet it was plugged into were not examined prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: Employees using an electric power tools were exposed to electrical hazards. The flexible cord used to power the circular saw and jigsaw was damaged.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: Employees using electric power tools were exposed to electrical hazards. There was no cover on the electrical outlet the flexible cord was plugged into.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.405 G01 III C
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(iii)(C): Flexible cords and cables were run through doorways, windows, or similar openings: Employees using an electric air compressor were exposed to electrical hazards. The flexible cord powering the compressor was run through a closed doorway.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331086454.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.