Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: TWIN LAKES ROOF SYSTEMS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TWIN LAKES ROOF SYSTEMS, LLC in 3001 S. VETERANS PKWY, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62704 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331088708.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Twin Lakes Roof Systems, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Twin Lakes Roof Systems, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3001 S. VETERANS PKWY
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62704
Mailing
2663 HIGHWAY 5 NORTH, MOUNTAIN HOME, AR 72653
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2012
Abate by
Jul 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $660 · Current $660
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA that the cited violation had been abated:       On December 28, 2011, Twin Lakes Roof Systems Inc., was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:      a.	Citation 1 Item 1a, and    b.	Citation 1 Item 1b.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $660

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 28, 2011
Abate by
Jan 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Prior to allowing employees to use the powered industrial vehicle, the employer did not ensure that each operator had completed training that included all of the truck and workplace related topics listed in the standard and completed an evaluation of the operators performance through practical exercises.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 28, 2011
Abate by
Jan 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):      The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph (l) and shall include the name of the operator, the date of training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:    The employer did not document the required powered industrial truck training and evaluation for each operator.  There was no written documentation that included the operator's name, date of the training, date of the evaluation and/or the name of the person conducting the evaluation.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331088708.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.