Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN DASEK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN DASEK in 7724 173RD PLACE, TINLEY PARK, IL 60477 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331089326.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Martin Dasek — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Dasek is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTIN DASEK
Site address
7724 173RD PLACE
City
TINLEY PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60477
Mailing
3921 NORTH LARAMIE, CHICAGO, IL 60641
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a.  On or about November 10, 2011, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations on a low sloped roof (4.5:12), eight (8) feet eight (8) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

View Martin Dasek's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331089326.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.