Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAYES ABRASIVES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HAYES ABRASIVES, INC. in 120 SMITH RD., HILLSBORO, IL 62049 (NAICS 327910). OSHA activity number 331090332.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hayes Abrasives, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hayes Abrasives, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 SMITH RD.
City
HILLSBORO
State
IL
ZIP
62049
Mailing
120 SMITH RD., HILLSBORO, IL 62049
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327910
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    Employees were exposed to caught in hazards while conducting service work on machines such as but not limited to the calender roll machines.  The employer had not developed a Lockout/Tagout Program for their worksite that addresses  the development, documentation, and utilizing of procedures for the control of any potentially hazardous energy release from the machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i):     Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing, or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:    Employees were exposed to caught in hazards while working around machines that are being serviced such as but not limited to the calender roll machines.  Standardized tags were not used when locks were applied to machines that were locked out to warn employees that the machine is locked out, that date when it was locked out and the identity of the person who locked the machine out.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    The employer had not developed an Industrial Truck Training program for employees who operated the Hyster, model number C187V06340P Powered Industrial Vehicle.  Operators had not been trained to operate the forklift and then certified as to have completed the formal discussion and practical demonstration of operating the truck safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.216 E

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.216(e):     Trip and/or emergency switches were not the type that required manual resetting:          On the Compound Machine calender, the emergency stop located on the west wall was not the manual resetting type.  The lower red button switch turned the machine off and another black switch turned it on.  The red button did not require it to be reset manually.   The emergency stop was not the type of electrical safety switch one that in case of switch malfunction, it would not allow the machine to operate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.219 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(i)(2):     Revolving surfaces of shaft coupling(s) were not covered by a safety sleeve:      Employees were exposed to rotating shaft coupling hazards at the south end of the production area.  The guard was missing for the shaft coupling  of the 50 HP Marathon electric motor, 1180 RPM, which drove the Western Gear Works for the Rubber City Machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.305 J02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(i):     All 15- and 20-ampere receptacles, attachment plugs and connectors were not constructed so that there were no exposed current-carrying parts except the prongs, blades, or pins:      Employees were exposed to electrical hazards on the west wall of the production area, northern end, where a faceplate was missing from the 110 volt electrical receptacle.   Current carrying parts located within the receptacle were exposed to contact.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i):     Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):      Employees were exposed to electrical hazards due to the 110 volt flexible extension cord in the production area was damaged.  Its outer insulation missing for a section of the cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communicationprogram which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning,material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    Employer had not developed a written Hazard Communications Program for their worksite that addresses all the criteria described above, where chemicals such as but not limited to aluminum oxide, talc, and other chemicals are in use at the facility.   The program ensures employees protection from chemicals in the workplace and emergency procedures to be followed in case of a reaction to chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals intheir work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trainedabout is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability,carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety datasheets.    Employees had not received training that addresses all the criteria described above, where chemicals such as but not limited to aluminum oxide, talc, and other chemicals are in use at the facility.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2012
Abate by
Mar 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1):     In every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial, orstorage purposes, the loads approved by the building official shall be marked on plates of approved design which shall be supplied and securelyaffixed by the owner of the building, or his duly authorized agent, in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate. Such plates shall not be removed or defaced but, if lost, removed, or defaced, shall be replaced by the owner or his agent.    Employees were exposed to struck by hazards due to overloading the elevated storage area at the south end of the Production Area, Compound Mill Area.  The Load Rating was not being posted for the second floor area to inform employees of the limitations of the capacity of the floor.   Various materials were stored on that level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331090332.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.