Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PRINTER'S EDGE INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRINTER'S EDGE INC in 4965 MAHONING AVE, WARREN, OH 44483 (NAICS 423830). OSHA activity number 331091827.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Printer'S Edge INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Printer'S Edge INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRINTER'S EDGE INC
Site address
4965 MAHONING AVE
City
WARREN
State
OH
ZIP
44483
Mailing
4965 MAHONING DR, WARREN, OH 44483
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423830
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b):     An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    The company did not have a written emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)    On or about 11/16/11, employees required to use fork trucks had not completed the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l) prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):     Flexible cords and cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure    Flexible cords were observed powering pneumatic stretching tables in the production area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.305 G01 IV D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D):     Flexible cords and cables were attached to building surfaces    Flexible cords that were attached to electrical conduit and light fixtures were observed powering pneumatic stretching tables in the production area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Company employees were exposed to chemicals including but not limited to Liquid Staple #850 Adhesive and Screen Block Out, and Liquid Staple #855 hardener catalyst. The employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    Squirt bottles containing Liquid Staple #850 Adhesive and Screen Block Out were not labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    Squirt bottles containing Liquid Staple #850 Adhesive and Screen Block Out were not labeled with hazard warnings to identify the hazards of the chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2011
Abate by
Feb 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area.    Company employees did not receive hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331091827.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.