TUSCOLA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: DAN WOOD
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAN WOOD in 703 EAST BUCKNER, TUSCOLA, IL 61953 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331091934.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAN WOOD
- Site address
- 703 EAST BUCKNER
- City
- TUSCOLA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61953
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 144, PESOTUM, IL 61863
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Dan Wood had employees exposed to electrical, struck-by hazards in the eyes, and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. Dan Wood had employees exposed to electrical, struck-by hazards in the eyes, and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer did not have a competent person at the construction site, who was competent in safety rules and requirements, in order to conduct frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. Dan Wood had employees exposed to struck-by hazards in the eyes from the use of pneumatic guns without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer did not provide employee safety training in order to provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Dan Wood had employees exposed to struck-by hazards in the eyes from the use of pneumatic guns without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. Dan Wood had employees exposed to electrical hazards from an unprotected electrical service entry point on the roof, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer could have provided protection by one of the following: a. De-energizing the circuit or b. Guarding against employee contact by effective insulation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3600.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Dan Wood had employees exposed to 9 ft. fall hazards without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3600
- — Z (S) $3600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Dan Wood had employees exposed to 9 ft. fall hazards without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (4)
- — F (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. Dan Wood had employees exposed to 9 ft. fall hazards, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that only extended 1.5 ft. above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Dan Wood had employees exposed to 9 ft. fall hazards, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that only extended 1.5 ft. above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois. The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate theses hazards. This training would include: a. The nature of fall hazards in the work area, b. The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems to be used, c. The proper construction use, placement, and care in handling of all ladders, d. The maximum intended load carrying capacities of ladders, and e. The standards contained in this subpart, Subpart X Stairways and Ladders.
Recent events (4)
- — F (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331091934.