OSHA Inspection: ADRIAN CASTILLO

Issued

Jan 10, 2012

Abate by

Jan 17, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,530 · Current $1,530

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.      a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) used hard hats while working below employee's working above their head, thereby exposing employee(s) to a potential struck-by hazard.

Issued

Jan 10, 2012

Abate by

Jan 17, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,530 · Current $1,530

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.      a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employee's were provided and utilized eye protection while using a nail gun to secure sheathing, thereby exposing employee's to a potential struck-by hazard.

Issued

Jan 10, 2012

Abate by

Jan 17, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,550 · Current $2,550

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.      a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employee's used fall protection while working at heights greater than six feet.