Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DAVE SABOTNIK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVE SABOTNIK in W254 S427 PIN OAK LANE, WAUKESHA, WI 53189 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331093906.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dave Sabotnik for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dave Sabotnik is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVE SABOTNIK
Site address
W254 S427 PIN OAK LANE
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53189
Mailing
1657 S. 28TH ST., MILWAUKEE, WI 53215
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $2,040
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2040

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331093906.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.