HARTFORD, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: THE HANDYMAN, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of THE HANDYMAN, L.L.C. in 11 E MONROE AVE, HARTFORD, WI 53027 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 331094003.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE HANDYMAN, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 11 E MONROE AVE
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53027
- Mailing
- 1430 N 17TH ST, SHEBOYGAN, WI 53081
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) Employees were conducting siding work from a roof while being exposed to an approximate 14 8/10 foot fall hazard without any fall protection system in place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work on the roof while being exposed to a fall hazard. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 14 8/10 feet. The employer did not ensure that the employees were trained to recognize and protect themselves from fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331094003.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.