HARTLAND, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: SCENIC HOME BUILDERS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCENIC HOME BUILDERS, INC. in 554 BIRCHWOOD DR., HARTLAND, WI 53029 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 331095869.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCENIC HOME BUILDERS, INC.
- Site address
- 554 BIRCHWOOD DR.
- City
- HARTLAND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53029
- Mailing
- 3942 ROSIE CT., COLGATE, WI 53017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) Employer did not ensure that an employee was using fall protection when working above the porch roof while conducting framing carpentry on a residential building. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard. (b) Employer dd not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working near a wall opening while conducting framing carpentry on a residential building. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. (a) Employer did not ensure that a ladder used to gain access to an upper work surface was at least 3' above the landing surface. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Jan 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attachedto the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied. (a) Employer did not ensure that a platform was secured to the forks of a rough terrain forklift. The platform was used by an employee to gain access to the upper level of a residential building and for the storage of sheathing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331095869.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.