FAIRFIELD, OH —
OSHA Inspection: BAKEMARK USA, LLC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BAKEMARK USA, LLC. in 9401 LE SAINT DR., FAIRFIELD, OH 45014 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 331096891.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAKEMARK USA, LLC.
- Site address
- 9401 LE SAINT DR.
- City
- FAIRFIELD
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45014
- Mailing
- 9401 LE SAINT DR., FAIRFIELD, OH 45014
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493120
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard: a) The product stored on three and four tier storage pallet rack system(s) located through out the warehouse had damage to the vertical up right and the horizontal structural members that would affect the structural integrity and weight capacity of the racking system and having the potential for stored material collapse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a fork truck. a) The employer had not provided fork truck training for some of the new hire employees who worked and operated fork truck equipment in the warehouse department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.178 L04 II B
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training in relevant topics was not provided to the operator when the operator had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident. a) The employer had not retained fork truck operators after evident damages had occurred to the pallet rack system(s) through out the warehouse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082.5
- — Z (S) $2975
More inspections at Bakemark USA, LLC.
View Bakemark USA, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493120)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331096891.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.