TOWNSEND, MT —
OSHA Inspection: GEORGE WHITE BARK PROCESSING CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEORGE WHITE BARK PROCESSING CO. in 139 CANTON LN, TOWNSEND, MT 59644 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 331097725.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGE WHITE BARK PROCESSING CO.
- Site address
- 139 CANTON LN
- City
- TOWNSEND
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59644
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 756, TOWNSEND, MT 59644
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321999
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, and service rooms were not kept clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition. a) Bagging area: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fire hazard where a build up of wood product had accumulated below the bagging shed. b) The plant: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a slip and trip hazard while using a set of stairs which had a large build up of wood product on each step. c) On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazards such as but not limited to fire where a build up of wood product existed in areas such as but not limited to the bagging area, Plant area and the grinder area.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance toa ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder. The railing shall be provided with a toeboard wherever, beneath the open sides, a) The Plant: On or about December 1, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 15 feet to the ground below where missing siding created large, unguarded wall openings on the elevated separator.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2250
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operatorand other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. a) Bagging area: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the unguarded pinch points on the unguarded chain drag. b) Bagging area: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the unguarded pinch point on one of the bark feed belts which has an old motor being used as a counter weight. c) The Plant: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the unguarded pinch point on the unguarded feed belts. d) The Grinder: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the unguarded pinch point on the unguarded chain drag at the tail pulley and at the supports. e) Shop Area: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the unguarded rotating chuck on the Enco drill press.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2250
- — C (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprockets and chains. All sprocket wheels and chains were not enclosed unless they are more than seven (7) feet above the floor or platform. Where the drive extends over other machine or working areas, protection against falling shall be provided. This subparagraph does not apply to manually operated sprockets. a) Bagging area: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to an amputation hazard while working on and near the unguarded chain and sprockets located out side the access door to the bagging room. b) Material sizing equipment: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to an amputation hazard while working on or cleaning up near the unguarded chain and sprocket approximately 6 feet 2 inches above the ground. c) The plant/separator: On or about December 1, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to an amputation hazard while walking and working in the area of the drive chain on the large separator.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.304 G06 VI C 8
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi)(C)(8): Exposed noncurrent -carrying metal parts of cord-and plug-connected equipment that may become energized was not grounded. On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a shock hazard while using non grounded hand lamps equipped with a metal reflectors through out the facility during night shit.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed. a) Bagging room: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazards such as burns from fire and arc flash from wood products collecting in energized transformers and disconnect panels which has unused openings into the electrical equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1250
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers identified for the purpose. If metal covers are used, they shall be grounded. In completed installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. Covers of outlet boxes having holes through which flexible cord pendants pass shall be provided with bushings designed for the purpose or shall have smooth, well-rounded surfaces on which the cords may bear. a) Grinder Building: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a shock hazard while walking and working in the area of the building referred to as the grinder from an out door junction box with no cover caring 480 three phase power. b) Conveyor to the grinder: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to electrical shock while cleaning and maintaining in the elevated out door area of the grinder where covers are not in place on the 480 three phase system. c) Conveyor to the grinder: On or about December 1, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a shock hazard while plugging in lamps, while working on and with a 120 volt outlet missing its protective cover. d) Maintenance shop: On or about December 1, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a shock hazard from the energized green outlet located on the outside of the maintenance shop near the door used to enter the shop.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV B
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cord and cables were run through holes in walls, ceillings, and floors. a) Bagging room: Employees were exposed to shock hazards when using cords which have been run through a hole in the metal exterior siding to operate repair tools out side. b) Repair shop: Employees were exposed to a shock hazard when using flexible cords which have been run through the metal exterior siding to provide power to the equipment such as front end loaders.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321999)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331097725.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.