Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: H.J. MARTIN & SON, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of H.J. MARTIN & SON, INC. in 975 PORT WASHINGTO RD, GRAFTON, WI 53024 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 331098152.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H.J. Martin & SON, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H.J. Martin & SON, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
975 PORT WASHINGTO RD
City
GRAFTON
State
WI
ZIP
53024
Mailing
320 S. MILITARY AVE., GREEN BAY, WI 54303
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i):     Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, workers installed lead-backed dry wall and plywood in a newly constructed CT area and performed power saw cutting of lead sheets, but no initial monitoring was conducted to evaluate their exposure to airborne lead.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 D02 V A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A):     Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) of this section with interim, appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section:    (a) The N95 dust masks which were provided to workers performing installation of lead-backed drywall and plywood, which involved power saw cutting of the lead sheets, were not adequate or appropriate interim respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(2)(i):     The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.62 to use a respirator:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011 in the CT area of the worksite, where workers were performing tasks including power saw cutting of lead sheeting, provision of respirators was not in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(f) in that no fit tests had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 F03 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(f)(3)(i)(C):     The employer did not provide HEPA filters for powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators:    (a) Workers who performed installation of lead-backed drywall and plywood, involving power saw cutting of lead sheets, used N95 negative pressure dust masks, but they were not provided with respirators featuring HEPA filters.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B):     Until the employer performs an employee exposure assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determines actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in (d)(2)(1), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) of this section with interim, appropriate personal protective equipment in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, in the CT area where workers performed installation of lead-backed drywall and plywood which involved power saw cutting of lead sheets, interim protective measures did not include provision of coveralls or similar full-body work clothing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1):     Where employees were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of respirators; where employees were exposed to lead compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation (e.g. lead arsenate, lead azide); and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), the employer did not ensure that each employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, in the Nuclear Medicine area where workers performed power saw cutting on lead sheets, interim protective measures did not include provision and use of appropriate personal protective equipment, such as coveralls or other similar full-body clothing to prevent contamination of the worker and the worker's garments.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C):     Until the employer performs an employee exposure assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determines actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) of this section with interim change areas in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this section:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, in the Nuclear Medicine area workers performed installation of lead-backed drywall and plywood and performed saw cutting of lead sheets, but interim protective measures did not include provision of change area(s) to prevent spread of lead contamination.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i):     The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011 in the CT area workers performed installation of lead-backed drywall and plywood and used a power saw to cut lead sheets, but clean change areas were not provided to enable workers to change out of and store work clothing and equipment prior to leaving the worksite.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E):     Until the employer performs an employee assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determines actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) of this section with interim biological monitoring in accordance with paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section, to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011 in the CT area, workers installed lead-backed drywall and plywood and performed power saw cutting of lead sheets, but there was no provision of interim blood sampling to evaluate blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i):     The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance, consisting of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels, to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level:  (a) On or around November 29, 2011 in the CT area, workers installed lead-backed drywall and plywood and performed power saw cutting on lead sheets, but blood sampling with analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F):     Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, three workers installed dry-wall and plywood, both of which were backed with lead sheeting, in the CT Department of a newly constructed cancer center.  This work involved cutting lead sheeting with a saws-all.  These workers were not provided training regarding the potential health hazards of exposure to lead dust, which may adversely affect the blood-forming, nervous, urinary, and reproductive systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1912.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1926.62 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not communicate information concerning lead hazards according to the requirements of OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard for the construction industry, 29 CFR 1926.59, including but not limited to the requirements concerning warning signs and labels, material safety datasheets (MSDS), and employee information and training:    (a) On or around November 29, 2011, three workers installed dry-wall and plywood, both of which were backed with lead sheeting in the CT Department of a newly constructed cancer center.  This work involved cutting lead sheeting with a saws-all.  These workers were not provided training regarding the potential health hazards of exposure to lead dust, which may adversely affect the blood-forming, nervous, urinary, and reproductive systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(h)(1):     All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:    (a) On December 6, 2011, OSHA wipe samples detected presence of lead contamination on the floor of the CT Department of the newly constructed cancer center, where installation of lead backed drywall and plywood had been performed on or around November 29, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3150
  • · Z (S) $6300

View H.J. Martin & SON, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331098152.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.