CENTERVILLE, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN SNIDER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KEVIN SNIDER in 6825 MARWYCK DR, CENTERVILLE, OH 45440 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331102202.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN SNIDER
- Site address
- 6825 MARWYCK DR
- City
- CENTERVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45440
- Mailing
- 130 CANNONBURY CT, KETTERING, OH 45429
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) The employer did not ensure that a frequent and regular was conducted in that employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. Employees were engaged in a residential roofing operation and exposed to a fall hazard in excess of 10 feet while not utilizing any type of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331102202.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.