Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FEED PRODUCTS SOUTH, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FEED PRODUCTS SOUTH, INC. in 920 FAIRWAY PARK DRIVE, MADISON, IL 62060 (NAICS 213115). OSHA activity number 331103192.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Feed Products South, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Feed Products South, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
920 FAIRWAY PARK DRIVE
City
MADISON
State
IL
ZIP
62060
Mailing
920 FAIRWAY PARK DRIVE, MADISON, IL 62060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213115
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6):     Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color:      Employees working in Bulk Storage Building A were exposed to trip/fall and struck-by hazards when the lighted exit sign for the building was inoperable.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1200
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     'Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.    The employer did not provide or assure the use of suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees exposed to urea, magnesium oxide and phosphate in Bulk Storage Building A.  Employees were exposed, at a minimum, to eye hazards, skin hazards, and respiratory hazards from the chemicals in use and provided PPE was not adequate.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1500
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:      The employer did not assess the hazards to which employees could be exposed to prior to employing them in Bulk Storage Building A where they worked with urea, magnesium oxide and phosphate.  Employees were exposed, at a minimum, to eye hazards, skin hazards, and respiratory hazards from the chemicals in use, which may require engineering controls, administrative controls or personal protective equipment to protect employees.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      Employees working with large quantities of powdered urea in the Bulk Storage Building A were subject to corrosive eye damage due to the lack of an emergency eyewash station.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $2100
  • · C (S) $4200
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced

Hazardous substances 16109987U105

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      The employer did not train employees on the chemicals used in Bulk Storage Building A where they worked with urea, magnesium oxide and phosphate.  Employees were exposed, at a minimum, to eye hazards, skin hazards, and respiratory hazards from the chemicals in use.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $300
  • · C (O) $600
  • · Z (O) $600

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2012
Abate by
Apr 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $600

Hazardous substances 1610

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):     Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(6) and (f)(7) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the following information:    The employer did not label, tag or mark a pile of approximately 27 one-ton Supersacks of magnesium oxide with either the identity or hazard warnings in the Bulk Storage Building A.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $600
  • · C (O) $600
  • · Z (O) $600

View Feed Products South, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331103192.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.