Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DR. O'CONNELL'S PAIN CARE CENTERS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DR. O'CONNELL'S PAIN CARE CENTERS, INC. in RT 108, SOMERSWORTH, NH 03878 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331106278.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DR. O'Connell'S Pain Care Centers, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DR. O'Connell'S Pain Care Centers, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
RT 108
City
SOMERSWORTH
State
NH
ZIP
03878
Mailing
255 RT. 108, SOMERSWORTH, NH 03878
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:    a. Site- Employees working from a work platform supported by a Skytrack all terrain forklift were exposed to a fall of approximately 15 feet where fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a. Site- Employees working from the roof were exposed to a fall of approximately 15 feet after they disconnected their personal fall arrest equipment to access a scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3): Employer did not meet the requirements of 1926.502(d)    a. Site- An employee was not adequately protected from a fall where their personal fall arrest system utilized an anchor point that comprised of tying their lifeline to a component of the scaffold that they were working from with a knot and having their personal fall arrest system rigged so that they could free fall approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.    a. Site- Employees working from the roof, near the eave, were exposed to additional bodily harm in the event of a fall due to them wearing their full body harnesses backwards with the D-ring at the wearers chest.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    a. Site- Employees working from a scaffold that was supported by an all terrain fork lift were not provided with scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    a. Site- Employees working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were  made without the manufacturer's written approval.    a. Site- a. Site- Employees were not protected from falls and struck by hazards where the employer lifted personnel with a home made for attachment on a sky track all terrain forklift, Model- 5030-4, Serial #- 8E0012, without the manufacturers written approval.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.602 C01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks:    a. Site- Employees working from the roof and a scaffold being supported by a sky track, model- 5030-4, serial #- 8E0012, all terrain fork lift did not have a means of egress when the forklift was left unattended by the operator. Also the employee working from the scaffold was exposed to a fall hazard where the fork lift was parked on an incline without the wheels being blocked.     American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks, section 603 (E) requires that When leaving a powered industrial truck unattended, load engaging means shall be fully lowered, controls shall be neutralized, power shut off, brakes set, key or connector plug removed. Block wheels if parked on an incline.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Apr 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l) and as referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d)      a. Site- employees operating sky track, model- 5030-4, serial #- 8E0012, all terrain fork lift were not provided with operator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.    a. Site- employees using a relocatable power tap, which was plugged into a GFCI protected electrical outlet, was not done in accordance with its equipments listing and labeling requirements where it is meant for indoor use only.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous.    a. Site- Employees were allowed to use an extension cord which was plugged into a GFCI protected electrical outlet for temporary power that was missing a ground pin
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2012
Abate by
Mar 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.    a. Site- employees were allowed to use a damaged cord, which was plugged into a GFCI protected outlet that lacked adequate strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331106278.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.