BILLINGS, MT ·
OSHA Inspection: MONTANA SULPHUR & CHEMICAL COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MONTANA SULPHUR & CHEMICAL COMPANY in 627 EXXONMOBIL ROAD, BILLINGS, MT 59107 (NAICS 325188). OSHA activity number 331106302.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MONTANA SULPHUR & CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Site address
- 627 EXXONMOBIL ROAD
- City
- BILLINGS
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59107
- Mailing
- PO BOX 31118, BILLINGS, MT 59107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325188
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): Machine or equipment isolation. All energy isolating devices that are needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, was not guarded. The guarding device was not in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, was not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.303 B07 I
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section did not determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination was not made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Montana Sulphur & Chemical Company
View Montana Sulphur & Chemical Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325188)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331106302.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.