O FALLON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: E Z ROOFING INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of E Z ROOFING INC. in 1100 BLOCK OF MCINTOSH CT, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331107243.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- E Z ROOFING INC.
- Site address
- 1100 BLOCK OF MCINTOSH CT
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62269
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 63, CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 2a, issued on 4/18/2012 with an abatement date of 4/19/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) for Citation 1, item 2b, issued on 4/18/2012 with an abatement date of 5/9/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $600
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,760 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees conducting roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof which was over 6 feet from a lower level were exposed to fall hazards, and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1760
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: Employees conducting roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof which was over 6 feet from a lower level were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b): Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet to the ground while performing roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof and were not wearing a safety harness with attached lanyard to the anchor rope as part of a personal fall arrest system, or by using other means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2480
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employer's training program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and was insufficient to train each employee in procedures to be followed in order to minimize fall hazards while employees worked on an approximately 11 foot high, 6 in 12 pitch roof
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,760 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Employees were exposed to fall of approximately 16 foot high to a lower level while using a Green Bull Ladder, which did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed, or the roof surface did not have a grasping device to provide assistance to the employee in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1760
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: The employer's training program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and was insufficient to train each employee in procedures for the use and placement of ladders, to be followed in order to minimize fall hazards while employees were exposed to fall of approximately 16 foot high to a lower level while using a Green Bull Ladder. The ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed, or the roof surface did not have a grasping device to provide assistance to the employee in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331107243.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.