Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: E Z ROOFING INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of E Z ROOFING INC. in 1100 BLOCK OF MCINTOSH CT, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331107243.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch E Z Roofing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E Z Roofing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
E Z ROOFING INC.
Site address
1100 BLOCK OF MCINTOSH CT
City
O FALLON
State
IL
ZIP
62269
Mailing
P.O. BOX 63, CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Jan 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):     The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    a)  For Citation 1, Item 2a, issued on 4/18/2012 with an abatement date of 4/19/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.    b)  for Citation 1, item 2b, issued on 4/18/2012 with an abatement date of 5/9/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $600

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
May 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:      Employees conducting roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof which was over 6 feet from a lower level were exposed to fall hazards, and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
May 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person:      Employees conducting roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof which was over 6 feet from a lower level were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
Apr 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,480 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):      Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet to the ground while performing roofing work on a 6 in 12 pitch roof and were not wearing a safety harness with attached lanyard to the anchor rope as part of a personal fall arrest system, or by using other means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2480
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
May 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:      The employer's training program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and was insufficient to train each employee in procedures to be followed in order to minimize fall hazards while employees worked on an approximately 11  foot high,  6 in 12 pitch roof
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
Apr 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      Employees were exposed to fall of approximately 16 foot high to a lower level while using a Green Bull Ladder, which did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed, or the roof surface did not have a grasping device to provide assistance to the employee in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2012
Abate by
May 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:    The employer's training program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and was insufficient to train each employee in procedures for the use and placement of ladders, to be followed in order to minimize fall hazards while employees were exposed to fall of approximately 16 foot high to a lower level while using a Green Bull Ladder.  The ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed, or the roof surface did not have a grasping device to provide assistance to the employee in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331107243.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.