Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: D & W FASTENER COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of D & W FASTENER COMPANY in 15 MAY AVE., BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 331107441.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D & W Fastener Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D & W Fastener Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15 MAY AVE.
City
BARBERTON
State
OH
ZIP
44203
Mailing
15 MAY AVE., BARBERTON, OH 44203
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):  Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:      a.  On or about December 29, 2011, employees were exposed to an approximate 58 and 1/4-inch fall hazard from the work platform of the milling machine.    b.  On or about December 29, 2011, employees were exposed to an approximate 87-inch fall hazard from the platform of the milling machine where the dust collector was located.      Note:  Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard.
Recent events (4)
  • · F (S) $1800
  • · F (S) $1800
  • · C (S) $3600

1910.25 D02 XI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.25(d)(2)(xi):  Ladders were used as guys, braces, or skids, or for other than their intended purposes:    On or about December 29, 2011, a portable wood ladder was not used as intended, in that; the A-frame ladder was not unfolded to access the platform of the milling machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3600
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.137(f)(1):  Exits were not located and access was not so arranged that exits were readily accessible at all times:    On or about December 29, 2011, the exit in the warehouse was not maintained in a manner to provide free and unobstructed egress, in that, the exit door was blocked by a lawnmower and other equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):  Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:      On or about December 29, 2011, the fire extinguisher training by the exit door in the warehouse was not readily accessible, in that, it was blocked by a lawnmower and other equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):  The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:     On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program and employees were voluntarily wearing tight-fitting half-face respirators when milling alumina silicate.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or used the respirator in the workplace:    On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to voluntarily wearing tight-fitting half-face respirators when half-face respirators when milling alumina silicate.    Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee���s medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):  The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:      On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D of the respirator standard to employees voluntarily wearing tight-fitting half-face respirators when milling alumina silicate.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2):  The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not provide fire extinguisher training initially upon employment and then annually thereafter.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1200
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about December 29, 2011, employees operating powered industrial trucks were not provided with operator training.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1200
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):  Where powered industrial trucks were found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the trucks were not taken out of service until they had been restored to safe operating condition:    On or about December 29, 2011, the Yale powered industrial truck had an inoperable horn and was not removed from service.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):  Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    On or about December 29, 2011, the Yale powered industrial truck was not inspected at least daily. The powered industrial truck had a horn that was inoperable.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):  Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:      On or about December 29, 2011, the sprocket wheel and chain drive on the milling was unguarded.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1200
  • · C (S) $3600
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:      On or about December 29, 2011, there were open, unused knockouts in the electrical outlet used to plug in the milling machine and associated equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program and employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, alumina silicate, paints, liquefied petroleum gas, and general lubricants.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $900
  • · C (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:        On or about December 29, 2011, the employer did not provide information and training to employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to; alumina silicate, paints, liquefied petroleum gas, and general lubricants.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331107441.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.