Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ORLANDO HERNANDEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ORLANDO HERNANDEZ in 326 WISCONSIN AVE, APPLETON, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331107730.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Orlando Hernandez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Orlando Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ORLANDO HERNANDEZ
Site address
326 WISCONSIN AVE
City
APPLETON
State
WI
ZIP
54913
Mailing
1207 W NORTHLAND AVE, APPLETON, WI 54914
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2012
Abate by
Apr 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Employees performing residential reroofing activities were not wearing or provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2012
Abate by
Apr 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.    Employees performing residential reroofing activities were not using complete personal fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2012
Abate by
Apr 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:      Employees were not trained to recognize fall hazards or to properly use fall protection equipment and systems
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2012
Abate by
Apr 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1):     Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:    Three different extesion cords that were in use by employees were damaged.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Orlando Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331107730.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.