Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GLOBAL LABOR SOURCE LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GLOBAL LABOR SOURCE LLC in 5508 S. FOREST HILL STREET, LITTLETON, CO 80120 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 331111054.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Global Labor Source LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Global Labor Source LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5508 S. FOREST HILL STREET
City
LITTLETON
State
CO
ZIP
80120
Mailing
2009 WADSWORTH BLVD #210, LAKEWOOD, CO 80214
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided which would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    a)  On or about December 7, 2011, employees were exposed to electrical shock because strain relief was not provided on an extension cord used to power equipment for asbestos abatement work.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G05 I B 2

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(5)(i)[B][2]:  Electrical circuits in the enclosure were not deactivated nor equipped with ground-fault circuit interrupters:    a)  On or about December 7, 2011, asbestos abatement employees were exposed to electric shock while using wet methods (water sprayer) and working in a negative pressure enclosure which contained electrical outlets and fixtures that had not been deactivated and were not equipped with ground fault circuit interrupters.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i):  The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation:      a)  On or about December 7, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to unknown quantities of airborne asbestos fibers while removing Class I and II asbestos containing materials because the employer had failed to perform an initial exposure assessment at or before the commencement of abatement activities.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1800
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.1101 H03 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(3)(iv)(A):  A tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirator or a full facepiece, supplied-air respirator operated in the pressure-demand mode and equipped with either HEPA egress cartridges or an auxiliary positive-pressure, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) was not provided to employees in a regulated area performing Class I asbestos work for which a negative exposure assessment was not available and the exposure assessment indicated that the exposure level will be at or below 1 f/cc as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    a)  On or about December 7, 2011, employees were potentially exposed to asbestos because the employer did not supply a full-face powered air-purifying respirator or a supplied air respirator to employees performing Class I asbestos abatement work where an exposure assessment had not been completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1800
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  On or about December 7, 2011, and at times prior, an employee wore a half-face elastomeric respirator without first being medically evaluated to ensure that he was physically fit to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331111054.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.