MISSOULA, MT —
OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. in 14377 PULP MILL ROAD, MISSOULA, MT 59806 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 331112052.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Site address
- 14377 PULP MILL ROAD
- City
- MISSOULA
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59806
- Mailing
- 14377 PULP MILL ROAD, MISSOULA, MT 59806
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1126 C
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(c): Permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer did not ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of chromium (VI) in excess of 5 micrograms per cubic meter of air (5 ugm/m3), calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1926.1126 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(e)(1)(i): Except as permitted in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, the employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to chromium (VI) to or below the PEL unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever feasible engineering and work practice controls are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer did not use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest levels achievable, and shall supplement them by the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1126 D01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(d)(1): Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section did not determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1926.1126 I01 I A
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1126(i)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for all employees who are or may be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Industrial Technologies Corp.
View Industrial Technologies Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331112052.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.