CANAL WINCHESTER, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: MARCELINO GONZALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCELINO GONZALEZ in 4805 LOBLOLLY DRIVE BUILDING 20, CANAL WINCHESTER, OH 43110 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331114074.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCELINO GONZALEZ
- Site address
- 4805 LOBLOLLY DRIVE BUILDING 20
- City
- CANAL WINCHESTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43110
- Mailing
- 425 STURBRIDGE ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) At the site, employer did not ensure that employees working on a roof were protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331114074.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.